Vicenzino B., Man Ther. 2004 Nov;9(4):185-96.

Physiotherapy Division, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. b.vicenzino@uq.edu.au

Orthotic therapy is frequently advocated for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain and injury of the lower limb. The clinical efficacy, mechanical effects, and underlying mechanism of the action of foot orthotics has not been conclusively determined making it difficult for practitioners to agree on a reliable and valid clinical approach to their application and indeed even their fabrication. This problem is compounded by evidence suggesting that the most commonly used approach for orthotic prescription, the (Biomechanical Evaluation of the Foot. Vol. 1. Clinical Biomechanics Corporation, Los Angeles, 1971) approach, has poor validity and many of the associated clinical measurements of that approach lack adequate levels of reliability. This paper proposes a new approach that is based on two key elements. One is the identification, verification and quantification of physical tasks that serve as client specific outcome measures. The second is the application of specific physical manipulations during the performance of these physical tasks. The physical manipulations are selected on the basis of motion dysfunction and their immediate effects on the client specific outcome measures serve as the basis to making an informed decision on the propriety of using orthotics in individual clients. The motion dysfunction also guides the type of orthotic that is applied. Practical case examples as well as generic and specific guidelines to the application of this clinical assessment process and orthotics are provided in this paper.

Link til abstract
Link til fulltekst
Les mer | Kommentér (0)

O'Sullivan PB, Beales DJ., Man Ther. 2007 May;12(2):e1-12.

Curtin University of Technology, School of Physiotherapy, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. P.Osullivan@curtin.edu.au

Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) disorders are complex and multi-factorial and are likely to be represented by a series of sub-groups with different underlying pain drivers. Both the central and peripheral nervous systems have the potential to mediate PGP disorders. Even in the case of a peripheral pain disorder, the central nervous system can modulate (to promote or diminish) the pain via the forebrain (cognitive factors). It is hypothesised that the motor control system can become dysfunctional in different ways. A change in motor control may simply be a response to a pain disorder (adaptive), or it may in itself promote abnormal tissue strain and therefore be 'mal-adaptive' or provocative of a pain disorder. Where a deficit in motor control is 'mal-adaptive' it is proposed that it could result in reduced force closure (deficit in motor control) or excessive force closure (increased motor activation) resulting in a mechanism for ongoing peripheral pain sensitisation. Three cases are presented which highlight the multi-dimensional nature of PGP. These cases studies outline the practical clinical application of a classification model for PGP and the underlying clinical reasoning processes inherent to the application of this model. The case studies demonstrate the importance of appropriate classification of PGP disorders in determining targeted intervention directed at the underlying pain mechanism of the disorder.

Link til abstract
Link til full tekst
Les mer | Kommentér (0)

O'Sullivan PB, Beales DJ., Man Ther. 2007 May;12(2):86-97.

School of Physiotherapy, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. P.Osullivan@curtin.edu.au

The diagnosis and classification of pelvic girdle pain (PGP) disorders remains controversial despite a proliferation of research into this field. The majority of PGP disorders have no identified pathoanatomical basis leaving a management vacuum. Diagnostic and treatment paradigms for PGP disorders exist although many of these approaches have limited validity and are uni-dimensional (i.e. biomechanical) in nature. Furthermore single approaches for the management of PGP fail to benefit all. This highlights the possibility that 'non-specific' PGP disorders are represented by a number of sub-groups with different underlying pain mechanisms rather than a single entity. This paper examines the current knowledge and challenges some of the common beliefs regarding the sacroiliac joints and pelvic function. A hypothetical 'mechanism based' classification system for PGP, based within a biopsychosocial framework is proposed. This has developed from a synthesis of the current evidence combined with the clinical observations of the authors. It recognises the presence of both specific and non-specific musculoskeletal PGP disorders. It acknowledges the complex and multifactorial nature of chronic PGP disorders and the potential of both the peripheral and central nervous system to promote and modulate pain. It is proposed that there is a large group of predominantly peripherally mediated PGP disorders which are associated with either 'reduced' or 'excessive' force closure of the pelvis, resulting in abnormal stresses on pain sensitive pelvic structures. It acknowledges that the interaction of psychosocial factors (such as passive coping strategies, faulty beliefs, anxiety and depression) in these pain disorders has the potential to promote pain and disability. It also acknowledges the complex interaction that hormonal factors may play in these pain disorders. This classification model is flexible and helps guide appropriate management of these disorders within a biopsychosocial framework. While the validity of this approach is emerging, further research is required.

Les mer | Kommentér (0)

O'Sullivan P., Man Ther. 2005 Nov;10(4):242-55. Epub 2005 Sep 9.

Body-logic Physiotherapy, 146 Salvado Rd, Wembley, WA 6014, Australia. POSullivan@curtin.edu.au

Low back pain (LBP) is a very common but largely self-limiting condition. The problem arises however, when LBP disorders do not resolve beyond normal expected tissue healing time and become chronic. Eighty five percent of chronic low back pain (CLBP) disorders have no known diagnosis leading to a classification of 'non-specific CLBP' that leaves a diagnostic and management vacuum. Even when a specific radiological diagnosis is reached the underlying pain mechanism cannot always be assumed. It is now widely accepted that CLBP disorders are multi-factorial in nature. However the presence and dominance of the patho-anatomical, physical, neuro-physiological, psychological and social factors that can influence the disorder is different for each individual. Classification of CLBP pain disorders into sub-groups, based on the mechanism underlying the disorder, is considered critical to ensure appropriate management. It is proposed that three broad sub-groups of CLBP disorders exist. The first group of disorders present where underlying pathological processes drive the pain, and the patients' motor responses in the disorder are adaptive. A second group of disorders present where psychological and/or social factors represent the primary mechanism underlying the disorder that centrally drives pain, and where the patient's coping and motor control strategies are mal-adaptive in nature. Finally it is proposed that there is a large group of CLBP disorders where patients present with either movement impairments (characterized by pain avoidance behaviour) or control impairments (characterized by pain provocation behaviour). These pain disorders are predominantly mechanically induced and patients typically present with mal-adaptive primary physical and secondary cognitive compensations for their disorders that become a mechanism for ongoing pain. These subjects present either with an excess or deficit in spinal stability, which underlies their pain disorder. For this group, physiotherapy interventions that are specifically directed and classification based, have the potential to impact on both the physical and cognitive drivers of pain leading to resolution of the disorder. Two case studies highlight the different mechanisms involved in patients with movement and control impairment disorder outlining distinct treatment approaches involved for management. Although growing evidence exists to support this approach, further research is required to fully validate it.

Les mer | Kommentér (0)